www.heyunfeng.com


Search Forum:

Forum Message
Topic: Re:IQ and Cognitive Development
Posted by: Michael Lamport Commons
Date/Time: 2009/4/19 9:14:17

Theo's work is the greatest.?For anything that is in written or transcribed verbal form, it saves tons of money and has the highest validity and reliability of any scoring scheme.?She also measures a much wider range of stages than anyone.?It is beyond my understanding why she only gets a poster.?My graduate students have used her scoring on a number of occasions.

Entire Thread

Topic(Point at the topics to see relevant reminders)Date PostedPosted By
IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/14 16:40:47Dave Moursund
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/14 16:44:19GS Chandy
     There are three differences2009/4/15 12:21:30Leslie Smith
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/15 12:22:11Theo Dawson
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/15 12:23:16Elizabeth Pufall
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/15 12:24:24Elizabeth Pufall
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/15 12:25:33Theo Dawson
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/15 17:35:41BOND, Trevor Grahame
     Shayer's work2009/4/16 8:32:02Theo Dawson
          Re:Shayer's work2009/4/16 8:32:59BOND, Trevor Grahame
          Re:Shayer's work2009/4/16 8:34:16Leslie Smith
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/16 12:35:34Michael Lamport Commons
     Piagetian concepts do not hold sway2009/4/18 19:05:39Michael Lamport Commons
          Re:Piagetian concepts do not hold sway2009/4/19 9:09:05Leslie Smith
          Re:Piagetian concepts do not hold sway2009/4/19 9:09:53Theo Dawson
               Re:Re:Piagetian concepts do not hold sway2009/4/19 9:10:42Leslie Smith
                    Re:Re:Re:Piagetian concepts do not hold sway2009/4/19 9:13:30Theo Dawson
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/19 9:07:43BOND, Trevor Grahame
          Re:Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/19 9:15:02Michael Lamport Commons
     Many thanks, and a related question2009/4/19 9:11:41David Moursund
          Re:Many thanks, and a related question2009/4/19 9:12:28Jeremy T. Burman
          Re:Many thanks, and a related question2009/4/19 9:20:54
               Re:Re:Many thanks, and a related question2009/4/19 9:21:58Stephan Desrochers
                    Re:Re:Re:Many thanks, and a related question2009/4/19 10:47:26Michael Lamport Commons
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/19 9:14:17Michael Lamport Commons
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/22 20:42:39Sandy McKinnis
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/24 21:40:18Ann Olivier
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/5/12 22:56:24David Moursund
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2010/7/11 22:37:57Michael Lamport Commons

Forum Home