www.heyunfeng.com


Search Forum:

Forum Message

Topic: Re:IQ and Cognitive Development
Posted by: Michael Lamport Commons
Date/Time: 2009/4/16 12:35:34

One approach to the IQ - Stage comparison is to use the Hierarchical Complexity Scoring Scheme (HCSS) to determine the order of hierarchical complexity of the task demands of each question in the tests.?Because there are many possible answers, only some of which are counted in the standard IQ scoring, it is necessary to figure out what the implicit task is for each.?Once one sees what task an answer correct addresses and that order of hierarchical complexity of that task, one can find the stage of performance on each item.?Remember, stage is not based on norms.?There are just 15 stages, if one includes the 0th stage for no stage.?One of the strengths of the Model of Hierarchical Complexity, is that it does not care about the content or context of an action.?It yields an order of hierarchical complexity for an item irrespective of the domain or content of that item.?That makes it very easy to compare a person's performances across tasks.?If one want to find out the distributional characteristics so that a person's stage can be enumerated in a psychometric way, one only has to run a Rasch Analysis on a reasonably large number of people.?I tend to be a little telegraphic, so feel free to ask questions and an expansion on any point.


Entire Thread

Topic(Point at the topics to see relevant reminders)Date PostedPosted By
IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/14 16:40:47Dave Moursund
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/14 16:44:19GS Chandy
     There are three differences2009/4/15 12:21:30Leslie Smith
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/15 12:22:11Theo Dawson
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/15 12:23:16Elizabeth Pufall
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/15 12:24:24Elizabeth Pufall
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/15 12:25:33Theo Dawson
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/15 17:35:41BOND, Trevor Grahame
     Shayer's work2009/4/16 8:32:02Theo Dawson
          Re:Shayer's work2009/4/16 8:32:59BOND, Trevor Grahame
          Re:Shayer's work2009/4/16 8:34:16Leslie Smith
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/16 12:35:34Michael Lamport Commons
     Piagetian concepts do not hold sway2009/4/18 19:05:39Michael Lamport Commons
          Re:Piagetian concepts do not hold sway2009/4/19 9:09:05Leslie Smith
          Re:Piagetian concepts do not hold sway2009/4/19 9:09:53Theo Dawson
               Re:Re:Piagetian concepts do not hold sway2009/4/19 9:10:42Leslie Smith
                    Re:Re:Re:Piagetian concepts do not hold sway2009/4/19 9:13:30Theo Dawson
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/19 9:07:43BOND, Trevor Grahame
          Re:Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/19 9:15:02Michael Lamport Commons
     Many thanks, and a related question2009/4/19 9:11:41David Moursund
          Re:Many thanks, and a related question2009/4/19 9:12:28Jeremy T. Burman
          Re:Many thanks, and a related question2009/4/19 9:20:54
               Re:Re:Many thanks, and a related question2009/4/19 9:21:58Stephan Desrochers
                    Re:Re:Re:Many thanks, and a related question2009/4/19 10:47:26Michael Lamport Commons
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/19 9:14:17Michael Lamport Commons
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/22 20:42:39Sandy McKinnis
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/4/24 21:40:18Ann Olivier
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2009/5/12 22:56:24David Moursund
     Re:IQ and Cognitive Development2010/7/11 22:37:57Michael Lamport Commons

Forum Home