www.heyunfeng.com


Search Forum:

Forum Message

Topic: Re:Re:Re:Some research on the epistemology of teachers
Posted by: Leslie Smith
Date/Time: 2008/10/29 11:26:35

Hi Jonas
1989: specific to science education, but its basis is in a modus operandi that is generalisable - see their 2002 book for manifestations.

Epistemology
This has a distinctive interpretation in philosophy as a normative investigation. In psychology, its interpretation as "personal epistemology" is different in that normativity has been "kicked out" with a view to avoiding the fallacy of psychologism [facts never entail norms; from "is" alone, there can be no "ought". See my 2006 chap 1 + 5] so as to focus on facts-alone about personal beliefs measured psychometrically or under experimental conditions that are normatively-free. The latter bears scant relation to the former, and arguable is not about epistemology at all [in the former sense]. Yet you can have your cake and eat it; you can retain insights from normative epistemology along with evidence from psychology - exactly that was Piaget's programme, aka genetic epistemology. I call this developmental epistemology [since 'genetic' today has lost most of its links with 'genesis' in view of advances in genetics qua DNA research]. Roughly, my view is that work in personal epistemology is only one part - and a small one at best; at worst, it is not even that - of a bigger story that has yet to be told. So if you want to do work on teachers' epistemologies, almost everything is still to be done here via re-visiting and reworking Piaget's programme with a joint focus on both norms and evidence.

Smith, L. (2006). Norms in human development: introduction. In L. Smith & J. Vonèche. (Eds.). Norms in human development. [pp.1-31]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, L. (2006). Norms and normative facts in human development. In L. Smith & J. Vonèche. (Eds.). Norms in human development. [pp.103-37]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, L. (in press 2009). Piaget's developmental epistemology. In U. Müller, J. Carpendale & L. Smith (eds.). Cambridge Companion to Piaget. New York: Cambridge University Press.

cheers
Les

Leslie Smith

Homepage Lake District
http://www2.clikpic.com/ls99/
Homepage Lancaster University
http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/edres/profiles/Leslie-Smith/


Entire Thread

Topic(Point at the topics to see relevant reminders)Date PostedPosted By
Some research on the epistemology of teachers2008/10/29 11:19:56Jonas Cox
     Re:Some research on the epistemology of teachers2008/10/29 11:21:28Leslie Smith
          Re:Re:Some research on the epistemology of teachers2008/10/29 11:25:41Cox, Jonas
     Re:Re:Re:Some research on the epistemology of teachers2008/10/29 11:26:35Leslie Smith
     Re:Some research on the epistemology of teachers2008/10/29 11:22:22Michael Lamport Commons
          Re:Re:Some research on the epistemology of teachers2008/10/29 11:28:36Cox, Jonas
     Re:Some research on the epistemology of teachers2008/10/29 11:24:22BOND, Trevor G.
     Here are instruments we use to train teachers and test for their stage of understanding.2008/10/29 11:30:42Michael Lamport Commons

Forum Home