|
Topic: | Re:Re:The status of Piaget's work today |
Posted by: | Richard Robinson |
Date/Time: | 2019/2/6 18:21:10 |
Thank you Anne-Nelly I found Mart?& Rodríguez both good and reassuring. I had always feared that psychology would follow Piaget with another of its peculiarly unconscious revolutions, and simply abandoned Piaget with something radically different (computationalism, etc.) and lost everything Piaget and his school achieved as fully as it had previously lost so many other insights. Instead it seems like his ideas have been preserved in quite a rational manner, without being followed or defended slavishly. |
Topic(Point at the topics to see relevant reminders) | Date Posted | Posted By |
The status of Piaget's work today | 2019/2/6 18:16:15 | Richard Robinson |
Re:The status of Piaget's work today | 2019/2/6 18:17:25 | Julie Shaw |
Re:The status of Piaget's work today | 2019/2/6 18:18:23 | PERRET-CLERMONT Anne-Nelly |
Re:Re:The status of Piaget's work today | 2019/2/6 18:21:10 | Richard Robinson |
Re:The status of Piaget's work today | 2019/2/6 18:22:01 | Michael Lamport Commons |
Re:The status of Piaget's work today | 2019/2/6 18:24:11 | Herb Saltzstein |
Re:The status of Piaget's work today | 2019/2/6 18:25:31 | Jeremy Burman |
Re:The status of Piaget's work today | 2019/2/6 18:26:52 | Carlos Garay |
Re:The status of Piaget's work today | 2019/2/6 18:26:53 | Carlos Garay |
Re:The status of Piaget's work today | 2019/2/6 19:13:19 | Bond, Trevor |
Re:The status of Piaget's work today | 2019/2/6 19:17:02 | Michael Lamport Commons |